The Twilight Saga: What's So Special?

64

By recklessfunk

I will admit, first and foremost, that I am a teenage girl (eighteen years old, to be exact) and have therefore gone through that period in my life where I decided to pick up Stephenie Meyer's Twilight and read it cover to cover. I also read all of New Moon, Eclipse, and even the disastrous finale to the saga, Breaking Dawn. That being said, I feel the need to speak up about the Twilight-related hubbub that's obviously been generated these past couple of years.

Believe it or not, yes, I am a teenage girl who detests this series more than I think I originally thought I would. As a matter of fact I thoroughly enjoyed the first book until I reread it and realized exactly what I had gotten myself into. "So why did you keep reading the series?" you may ask. To be honest, I had hopes that it would get better. What a stupid idea that was.

If you're reading this now, chances are that you know the basic plotline: Bella Swan, an average teen, moves to the town of Forks where she meets and then falls in love with Edward Cullen, who happens to be a vampire. Fair enough. We can all use that bit of romance in everyday literature. There are, however, several things that bother me greatly about the series.

Twilight, the teen bestseller.
Twilight, the teen bestseller.

An Unhealthy Protagonist

If you're an avid fantasy reader like me, then you might recall several other heroine greats: Susan Pevensie of The Chronicles of Narnia, Hermione Granger of the Harry Potter series, etc. What these females all have in common is the courage and independency that they have apart from their male friends. In short, Susan can shoot her own bow and arrow, and Hermione can cast her own spells.

Bella Swan, on the other hand, does absolutely nothing to defend herself. I'm not saying that she should pick up a katana and start swinging it aimlessly at other vampires, but a little effort on her part would make her seem less like a completely helpless, brainless female. Instead she relies heavily on Edward to save her from every little incident - from her passing out at the sight of blood to being cornered by a bloodthirsty rogue vampire. It gets quite tiresome, to be honest.

She in fact depends on Edward so much that she lets him get away with the most ridiculous things: taking apart her car so she can't visit her friends, watching her sleep, and sneaking into her house (just to name a few). In this sense some readers would call Edward almost abusive and overly-controlling in his relationship with Bella. But it's okay with her because he's handsome and he sparkles in the sunlight.

What kind of message does this send to younger readers? "Act like a sissy, get yourself into heaps of trouble, attempt suicide (as Bella does in New Moon) and wait for your soul mate to come and rescue you"? Wonderful.

Bella also becomes the stereotypical female in the household. She lives with her father Charlie in Forks and so she literally does everything for him: she cooks all the meals, she cleans up afterwards, she does the laundry, she makes sure the fridge is full, etc. What does Charlie do in the house? As far as we know, and as far as Meyer goes to show us, he sits on the couch and watches football games all the time. Granted, yes, the typical American man does this, but I'm skeptical to believe it would be the same scenario if the man was a single father with his only daughter living in the household. Surely he would then help her out with the day-to-day chores? I guess not.

Meyer's Writing

There are a few complaints I'd like to make concerning Meyer's actual writing. One of them is the general misuse of adverbs. It's as if Meyer feels that more words equals better writing and so she throws adverbs around like confetti at a wedding party. There are phrases like "chuckled darkly," "threatened darkly," and "suggested doubtfully" that, if read in context, could still make sense without the adverbs. (As a side note, Charlie McDonnell of YouTube fame brings up a fair point: How do you chuckle darkly?)

There is also the general wordiness and over-exaggerration of some sections in the book. One example is in Twilight when Bella goes on her computer to research vampires:

"I hated using the Internet here. My modem was sadly outdated, my free service substandard; just dialing up took so long that I decided to go get myself a bowl of cereal while I waited...Naturally, the screen was covered in pop-up ads...Eventually I made it to my favorite search engine...It took an infuriatingly long time, of course...I waited impatiently for it to load" (Twilight 132-33).

We get it, Bella. Your Internet sucks.

The book in its entirety is written like a poorly thought-out fan fiction where the only things going on are events written out in low-quality sentences. In fact, some parts sound as though Meyer herself got bored of her own writing:

"We lapsed back into silence as we finished eating. He cleared the table while I started on the dishes. He went back to the TV, and after I finished washing the dishes by hand - no dishwasher - I went upstairs unwillingly to work on my math homework. I could feel a tradition in the making...The rest of the week was uneventful" (Twilight 37).

As you can see, the majority of the novel goes on in this fashion: First I did this, then I did this, and then I did this, and finally I did this. A third-grader can write the same way - it's really not that impressive. And yes, ladies and gentlemen, that is how the series goes: Bella does "stuff" and Edward is pretty.

The characterization of Bella is also far beyond off. It's so off that I can't even find a good metaphor for how off it is. Bella is, presumably, an average seventeen year-old teenage girl with hormones and the like. Tell me then: have you ever come across a teenager who talks like this:

"It rains on this inconsequential town more than any other place in the United States of America. It was from this town and its gloomy, omnipresent shade that my mother escaped with me when I was only a few months old...It was to Forks that I now exiled myself - an action that I took with great horror. I detested Forks" (Twilight 4).

I'm sorry, but no teenager I know has any idea what any of those words in bold mean, much less are able to use them correctly in a sentence. Bella Swan is not an average teenager. What average girl reads Wuthering Heights for the fun of it?

Finally, the lack of description is terrifying. On the fourth page of the first book - not even into the actual storyline yet (or lack thereof) - there is this statement:

"My mom looks like me, except with short hair and laugh lines" (Twilight 4).

We don't know what Bella looks like. There has been absolutely no physical description of Bella at all. Thank you, Stephenie Meyer, for that completely pointless description.

Lessons: Where Are They?

By the looks of this subtitle, let me first say that I in no way believe that every single book ever written in the history of mankind needs one enormous umbrella moral or value that makes it a great book. Not every book needs to teach a lesson. After all, some stories are just written for pure entertainment. This could, of course, be Twilight's case. By the same token, there are a few things that younger readers could take away from the series, and they're not all good. Here are a few, albeit blunt, lessons that Meyer seems to promote:

  1. It's perfectly okay for your boyfriend to control every aspect of your life. If he takes apart your car to keep you from going somewhere, it means he loves you. A lot.
  2. Your boyfriend has to be perfect. No flaws. He must also be filthy rich and come from a well-preserved family (the Cullens are wealthy because one of them, Alice, can see the future and can therefore predict trends in the stock market. How convenient).
  3. Being your own hero, especially if you're a girl, is overrated. Sit down and wait for your knight in shining armor to come. Don't take matters into your own hands.
  4. Stay in the kitchen. Literally.
  5. If he doesn't talk about how much he wants to kill you and drink your blood every five minutes, he's just not that into you.
  6. It is very, very, very important that you have a boyfriend, otherwise your life is not worth living and you might as well throw yourself off a cliff (as seen in New Moon).
  7. Your friends are unimportant. Who cares about their silly, petty problems when you have your own? (As seen every time Meyer writes about someone who is not a vampire).

In the end, this series has plenty of wrong twists and turns, bad writing, and lack of characterization and plot. It's a good read for the younger generation who are looking for something to merely pass the time with (probably between the ages of 13 and 17) but for those who are looking for more substance, this wouldn't be your best pick. Start out with something that falls into the category of "real literature" and work your own way from there.

Comments

Jason 20 months ago

This is amazing. I love you :)

Nevermore 20 months ago

Agree completely. Never was a fan of the series. You brought up some good points too! Great article.

Debby Bruck profile image

Debby Bruck Level 7 Commenter 20 months ago

RECKLESSFUNK ~ Do we have a book author in the making? Enjoyed reading your critical review of this series, and I suppose, now, will never read it. Super to read a teen's analysis with a keen eye and a sharp tongue, and the brains to realize not everything needs to be the way it is written in fiction novels. The stereotypes, so redundant, that you become bored out of your mind. The characters frozen in their mold, so they become popsicles. Wondering how you will review these books in ten or twenty years from now; and if you really DID learn a lesson about independence, making a stand, and doing your own thing. Blessings, Debby [hub-hop]

recklessfunk profile image

recklessfunk Hub Author 20 months ago

Debby Bruck - Actually, I *am* an aspiring author. I've already self-published a sci-fi/horror lite novel called 'Chasing Light' (more info is on my profile). I'm glad you found my review helpful and to your liking, as I usually don't do reviews but thought it would be a fun experience. Thanks so much for your input!

Luciendasky profile image

Luciendasky 20 months ago

I ONE HUNDRED PERCENT AGREE... and I am glad to know that at least one teenage girl did not get taken in by this series!

But even people in my age range (I am 26) still like the book and I finally to read it for myself. Half way through I decided to watch to movie to see if ANYTHING happened in the book. As you know, nothing really does, except that Bella drowns herself in love for a monster who is controlling and a charmer (I dislike charmers... they are usually trouble), and ends up getting almost killed for (in my opinion) making bad decisions.

Luciendasky profile image

Luciendasky 20 months ago

HA HA HA! I just made my bf read it as well and he totally agrees. You are totally awesome.

recklessfunk profile image

recklessfunk Hub Author 20 months ago

samsam1s - I DID mention in my review that even though it may be written purely for entertainment purposes, people still might be able to find a lesson or a moral within the story, and if they take it to heart then the ones that are being "taught" are, in my opinion, not very healthy.

As for no one in their right mind taking this book seriously, I may have to introduce you to some of my classmates. It's quite scary. Some of the more extreme "Twi-hard" fans out there will go to any lengths to prove that this book is superior to all others. About a year ago there was a news story about a girl who poured acid on her lab partner because her partner didn't think Edward Cullen was perfect. People out there CAN be very crazy, and it's frightening that a silly book like this can do that to a person.

SognoPiccolo profile image

SognoPiccolo 20 months ago

thank you for writing exactly what I thought of the book as well. lol this is great you are undoubtedly awesome.

Sunny Robinson profile image

Sunny Robinson 20 months ago

samsam, I totally get what you're saying. However, most of what is written today is influenced by and will influence the readers. How people take to a book is how they perceive it, which in effect shows the sociology and psychology of it all.

What really gets me is the standards in any genre. I mean, sure, if it works for you, it works for you. You enjoy reading it, that's totally awesome.

But books stay with some people. Some stories or words or ideology present stays with people who read, no matter if it isn't real. This is proven time and time again with classic fiction books that have stayed true through the centuries. My fear is this book has no genuine feel to it by the author and yet it is considered classic already by today's generation. People's obsession to it isn't from thought-provocation, but mindless desire for an Edward Cullen or Bella Swan. It's pretty freaky, if you ask me. :)

Anyway, recklessfunk, I totally hijacked your comment section and I apologize! I am with you 100% and I love how you critiqued it.

SognoPiccolo profile image

SognoPiccolo 20 months ago

The people determining what is "classic" now-a-days ARE the teenagers who read it, the problem with that is 13-17 year old age, 40 years ago , are NOT the same as 13-17 years old age range as today... before, reading books was the main form of entertainment and quality didn't suffer. Now it's all about technology and it makes for different plots.

shellyakins profile image

shellyakins 20 months ago

So glad to see that I am not the only one in the world who didn't like the Twilight series. I agree with you in that the writing was poor quality and overly drawn-out. I found myself screaming multiple times "Get on with it already!" Like you, I read the whole series thinking things HAVE to get better, but they didn't.

I can't stand female characters who can't defend themselves and relay on other people to do that for them. They can have flaws or be reluctant heroes, but I like when they are brave and make their own decisions...not constantly pining away for the guy.

If you haven't read them, check out The Uglies series. Awesome female character who just wants to fit in, but fate has other ideas for her. There is an undertone of a love story, but it doesn't dominate the whole plot.

vicky_darla profile image

vicky_darla 20 months ago

ahhhh this is awesome :)

I really enjoyed reading your writing and agree with everything you said. The first time I read the books I was a few years younger than I am now and have to admit that I did enjoy them, however I read them again recently and picked up on everything you said, she has a good basic storyline but the way she writes is just terrible.

thank you for this entertaining read and am looking forward to reading your other hubs :)

Jason 20 months ago

Vicky-you should check out her book, Chasing Light (you can find it on Amazon.com or Lulu.com). It's really awesome :D

Mangyhyena 12 days ago

I couldn't disagree with you more.

Bella does change throughout the series, as does Edward, unless you ignore the transition from a girl who has never had a boyfriend to a married woman with a daughter. Edward changes as well, especially if you view his change as one from a non-human creature who emulates human qualities for the sake of blending in to a conflicted person who struggles to find his humanity, which he ultimately does through his deepening relationship with Bella.

As for the messages readers could take from The Twilight Saga, you are correct, they could possibly take those negative messages from the series. Then again, they could also take the positive messages about putting others before yourself or having courage in the face of overwhelming challenges, to name a few. The same argument could be made against 'Of Mice And Men' when referring to Lenny's last moment. Does anyone think readers finished that book with the message that if someone is really your best friend you should shoot them in the head? Doubt it.

Bella did take action, rather than wait for Edward to save her, repeatedly. She went to face James all by her little lonesome, did she not? She did so with no expectation Edward would arrive in time to save her. She willingly went to face what to her was certain death, and she did that to save her mother's life.

Bella was the one who came up with the plan to lure James away from Forks, instead of simply letting Edward drive her away from the danger, so I'd hardly call her brainless.

Again, she takes action to save Edward in 'New Moon' when she goes to Italy, putting her life at risk. Again, she put another person before her.

In Breaking Dawn, Bella plays a major role in saving not just herself, but the entire Cullen Clan, when she faced the Volturi and neutralized their offensive capabilities.

You made valid points about the writing, technically speaking. However, the goal of all writing is communication. You admitted you enjoyed it the first time you read it. It sucked you in, correct? It did so because Stephenie Meyer successfully communicated her story to you. It wasn't until you read it again that you found things you disliked. Anyone can tear a work to pieces, if they go into the story looking for proof it's no good. Most readers suspend their disbelief as they read, especially when reading romance, sci-fi, fantasy, or horror. If they didn't, there would be no such thing as fiction.

Another thing worth noting is how well-developed the supporting characters were. I didn't know Jasper's back story, as one example, when he was first introduced, but upon reading the series again, I realized he spoke and acted in a manner consistent with his back story throughout the entire series. Same with the rest of the Cullen's.

Obviously, you are entitled to your opinions and free to express them. They are as valid as any other opinion. I just wanted to throw out a contrasting opinion for consideration. Isn't it always fun to see how two different people can read the same book and come away with completely different takes on it? To me, this is the magic of writing.

Good luck with your self published novel. I'll look for you on the top ten in the years to come.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working